Gavotte & Plants

equalseleventhirds:

Don’t get me wrong now. I loved the finale. It was brilliant and gorgeous and just overall well-done. The plot twists! The emotions! The acting! Yes, good.

But I’m still a bit disappointed that the writers chose to use the character I call “adaptation!Irene.”

Read More

(via rubenrobinsons)

crumplesnacks:

A Very Fed-Up Meta by Me

Read More

(via misanderingthroughthewoods)

deducecanoe:

anartinsorcery:

 

feministcrixus:

irresistible-revolution:

fandom0ftheopera:

I’ve seen Elementary fans claiming their Sherlock is better than Sherlock’s because ours is an asshole and theirs is ‘sympathetic’ and ‘kind’.

I have nothing against Elementary, but may I just remind you - Sherlock is an asshole, because Sherlock is canonically an asshole. He was described as being cold, dispassionate and arrogant - not kind.

oh dear.

From ‘The Adventure of the Three Garridebs’, when Watson is shot: “For the first time, I had a glimpse of a great heart as well as a great brain.”

From ‘The Adventure of the Six Napoleons’, when Lestrade pays Holmes a sincere and heartfelt compliment : “And as he turned away, it seemed he was more nearly moved by the softer human emotions than I had ever seen him.”

From ‘The Problem of Thor Bridge’, when a rich client explains how he tried to seduce his children’s governess: “this young lady was in a sense under your protection…you have tried to ruin a defenseless girl who was under your roof. Some of you rich men have to be taught that all the world cannot be bribed into condoning your offenses.”

From ‘The Adventure of the Veiled Lodger’, after hearing the tragic story of a woman whose face was mauled by a lion; “Then Holmes stretched out his long arm and patted her hand with such a show of sympathy as I had seldom known him to exhibit, ‘Poor girl!’ he said, ‘Poor girl! The ways of fate are indeed hard to understand. If there is not some compensation hereafter, then the world is a cruel jest’ “

From ‘The Adventure of the Speckled Band’, when speaking with a client whose father is physically abusive: “Five little livid spots, the marks of four fingers and a thumb, were printed upon the white wrist. ‘You have been cruelly used,’ said Holmes.”

Also, in “The Adventure of Abbey Grange,” he helps a young man escape, who intervened to prevent an alcoholic aristocrat from beating his wife.

In “The Adventure of the Second Stain”, Holmes goes out of his way to shield Lady Hilda from her husband’s anger, even though the husband was Holmes’ client.

In “The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle” he lets a pathetic petty criminal go free because he doesn’t think making him a ‘jailbird’ will help.

There are many other instances of Holmes showing kindness, empathy and even breaking the law to help people gain justice.

Other phrases and words Watson uses to describe Holmes at various times:

“quiet, genial.”

“without a harshness, which was foreign to his nature.”

“he had a remarkable gentleness and courtesy in his dealings with women.”

Holmes may have displayed a certain impatience for social affectation, but he maintains a strong moral compass and asserts this fact several times, in various situations, towards various people.

This idea that Holmes is a “sociopathic” asshole is quite a contemporary reading and, might I add, a lazy one that’s as ignorant of mental illness as it is offensive to those of us who’re tired of white men getting to stomp all over people in the name of ‘genius’ and ‘anti-hero’ status. BBC Sherlock’s reading of Holmes is one that’s built on popular cultural tropes, and succeeds because of it. ‘Elementary’ reads Holmes with a fuller attention to the complexities of his character.

Anytime someone says ‘well Holmes is an asshole’ as a conclusive fact, I know that your canon knowledge is either limited or deliberately misinterpreted.

Do some re-reading.

goshdarn it, I love it when a PSF is taken to the cleaners on zomgHOLY canon

Let me love you. No, really. Holmes has no patience for certain social conventions (though he can be gentlemanly enough) but he is kind to women and children. And he’s much more inclined to break the law, and has a dimmer view of the law versus justice in stories written after the hiatus. I don’t see BBC Sherlock as “inhuman” or Elementary Sherlock as “more human” or “more accessible.” I see Elementary Sherlock as just an older, more mature figure who’s learned how to tame some of his baser impulses (like NOT pounding on the chair in the last episode).

BBC Sherlock is young, untested… with all that wildness of youth still in him. He sees no need for social convention. Elementary Sherlock has no USE for social convention, but sees that it smooths things over sometimes. a bit of politeness here and there opens doors. BBC Sherlock is about the chase, the hunt, the puzzle. Nothing else matters. His involvement in the case ends once he has satisfied his own curiosity. Elementary Sherlock is still invested in the puzzle, but he’s learned that there are other things at stake.

Elementary’s Sherlock is very much like the canon Holmes, who often makes comments on the social condition of the times in which he lives. That’s why he takes the CHAS case—he is trying to prevent a lady from being ruined and losing her marriage prospects by negotiating with her blackmailer on her behalf. Neither one is better than the other. They’re just at two different places in their lives, and in their careers.

(via sleuthian)